__timestamp | Carlisle Companies Incorporated | Cummins Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 512300000 | 2498000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 631900000 | 2604000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 580200000 | 2534000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 609300000 | 3035000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 696100000 | 3486000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 851000000 | 3623000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 733100000 | 3125000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 816100000 | 2862000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1483400000 | 3802000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1210700000 | 3025000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1356800000 | 6338000000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial giants, Cummins Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated have showcased intriguing financial trajectories over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Cummins Inc. consistently outperformed Carlisle in terms of EBITDA, with an average of approximately $3.06 billion annually, nearly four times Carlisle's average of $812 million.
This analysis highlights the dynamic nature of these industrial leaders, offering valuable insights for investors and industry enthusiasts alike.
Who Generates More Revenue? Cummins Inc. or Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Cummins Inc. vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Research and Development Investment: Cummins Inc. vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Cummins Inc. and Masco Corporation: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Cummins Inc. vs Snap-on Incorporated
Cummins Inc. or Carlisle Companies Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Cummins Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Cummins Inc. Compared to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Cummins Inc. vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Cummins Inc. vs Pentair plc